A major debate has erupted in India after a senior leader of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), Dattatreya Hosabale, suggested that the words “socialist” and “secular” should be removed from the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. This has sparked strong reactions from political parties and reignited discussions about the country’s founding principles and constitutional values.
What Did the RSS Leader Say?
At an event marking 50 years since the Emergency, RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale said that the terms “socialist” and “secular” were not part of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s original draft of the Constitution. He pointed out that these words were added during the Emergency in 1976, a time when many basic rights were suspended and the Parliament and judiciary were under great pressure. Hosabale argued that since these terms were not in the original Preamble, it is time for a public debate on whether they should remain.
He questioned, “The Preamble is eternal. But is socialism, as an ideology, eternal for India?” and suggested that the country should reconsider the relevance of these terms in today’s context.
Why Were These Words Added?
The words “socialist” and “secular” were included in the Preamble during the 42nd Amendment in 1976, under then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government. This was during the Emergency, a period in Indian history when civil liberties were restricted, and the government had sweeping powers. The original Constitution, adopted in 1950, did not include these words, although many believe the spirit of secularism and social justice was already present in its provisions.
Political Reactions
The Congress party, which was in power during the Emergency, has strongly criticized the RSS leader’s remarks. Congress leaders accused the RSS of never accepting the Constitution and of trying to undermine the vision of its chief architect, Dr. Ambedkar. They argued that secularism and socialism are essential to India’s identity and ensure equality and justice for all citizens.
Congress communications chief Jairam Ramesh pointed out that the Supreme Court has already upheld the Preamble’s language, and accused the RSS and BJP of repeatedly calling for changes to the Constitution. He also said that the people of India had rejected such calls in the recent elections.
The Larger Debate
This controversy is not just about two words. It raises bigger questions about what kind of country India wants to be. Supporters of keeping the words “socialist” and “secular” argue that these principles are crucial for protecting the rights of minorities and the poor. They see secularism as a guarantee that the government will treat all religions equally, and socialism as a commitment to reducing inequality.
On the other hand, those who want the words removed say that these terms were added in a time of crisis, without enough public debate. They argue that India’s values are much older and broader than any single ideology, and that the Constitution should reflect the country’s unique history and traditions. Some also believe that the government should not be tied to any specific economic or religious philosophy.
What Happens Next?
The RSS has called for a national discussion on this issue, rather than an immediate change. This means that the debate is likely to continue, with scholars, politicians, and ordinary citizens sharing their views.
The Congress party and other opposition groups have made it clear that they will resist any attempt to change the Preamble. They see this as an attack on the core values that have held India together since independence.
Why Does This Matter?
For many Indians, the Preamble is more than just a few lines at the start of a legal document. It is a statement of the country’s hopes and dreams. Changing its language is a big step, and one that could shape the nation’s future for generations.
Some experts believe that India’s strength lies in its ability to balance different ideas—modern and traditional, religious and secular, individual and collective. The current debate is a test of how well the country can handle disagreements about its identity, without losing sight of the values that unite its people.
Final Thoughts
The call to remove “socialist” and “secular” from the Constitution’s Preamble has brought old arguments back to the surface. It is a reminder that the meaning of India’s Constitution is still being discussed and defined, even 75 years after it was written. Whether or not these words remain, the debate itself shows that the Constitution is a living document—one that belongs to all Indians, and one that must reflect the changing hopes and challenges of the nation.
With inputs from agencies
Image Source: Multiple agencies
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved Powered by Vygr Media.
